Home » Forums » Non-aviation » 80-400mm VR Lens or 70-200mm F2.8 VR II Lens?
Jacob Brownlee Member Joined in March 2015 Posts: 16 |
Posted 28 December 2016 - 22:43 CET |
Hi everyone,
I am going to LAX to spot in early January. I am going to use the Nikon D750 camera. I haven't used this camera or any full frame before so I thought renting it would be a nice idea. For anyone who's spotted at LAX, you know about Imperial Hill (Jim Clutters Park.) From this location, would the 70-200 be enough? I would just go with the 80-400 since that would be plenty, but for night panning the F2.8 comes in handy and the lens itself it very sharp. I've used both the 70-200 F2.8 VR II and the 80-400 VR so I have some experience with both lenses. I can also say that on the 80-400 I used, anywhere after about 330mm it got a lot less sharp. Let me know what you think.
Thanks, Jacob |
Rod Dermo Full member Joined in January 2008 Posts: 3 |
Posted 29 December 2016 - 16:26 CET |
Hi Jacob Been to Clutters park a few times over the years(you,ll love it)when there I used the 80-400 D600 Cropped sensor down to DX format to give me the reach I needed,They tend to use the far runway the most, I always keep the lens at around 300mm shooting at F8 to keep things sharp.Winter is a good time to go the sun is behind you and low so you can shoot all day long.When the light starts to fade I put on auto ISO and shoot until the light won,t allow.I have not tried the 70-200 as of yet so I can,t say I do hear it,s a fast sharp lens. Hope this helps
Rod |
AzumaR Member Joined in January 2017 Posts: 2 |
Posted 4 October 2019 - 18:49 CET |
i chose 70-200mm lens |
This topic is locked.