Home » Forums » Aviation photography » Rejected photo
Rejected photo
Michał Kuna   Member Joined in April 2015 Posts: 8 |
Posted 8 March 2019 - 16:16 CET |
|
I don't know what is wrong...
Accepted photos:
https://www.airplane-pictures.net/photo/1171125/15113-portugal-air-force-general-dynamics-f-16a-fighting-falcon/ https://www.airplane-pictures.net/photo/1171123/15103-portugal-air-force-general-dynamics-f-16a-fighting-falcon/
REJECTED photos...due to SKY
https://www.airplane-pictures.net/images/rejected-images/2019-3/1171126.jpg https://www.airplane-pictures.net/images/rejected-images/2019-3/1171124.jpg
Toshikiko of course...... "Requirements are higher for sky shot" |
Dominik Kauer   Full member Joined in May 2016 Posts: 38 |
Posted 8 March 2019 - 18:14 CET |
|
Different screener, different decision. But there is a slight white framing around the aircraft... |
Igor Kmet   Full member Joined in September 2013 Posts: 99 |
Posted 8 March 2019 - 18:42 CET |
|
I would use local sharpening and halo efect removing technique https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_hOXwtV8io |
|
Michał Kuna Member Joined in April 2015 Posts: 8 |
Posted 8 March 2019 - 19:12 CET |
|
Yes.... halo efect is my mistake. I asking about sky. 4 photos..same screener..
|
Karol Trojanowski  Senior admin Joined in June 2016 Posts: 82 |
Posted 8 March 2019 - 23:04 CET |
|
In general, accepting or rejecting skyshots is a decision made on screener's discretion. Each time overall quality (sharpness) is considered, also angle (unique and "wow" angles are welcomed, not a common side-ons), and conditions (light, vortexes etc.). Sometimes even type of aircraft can change the screener's decision. Rare types are considered as more acceptable.
So, there's no one, ultimate rule for skyshots. We're just trying to get rid of, generally speaking, boring shots, and everyone has slightly different definition of boredom, and slightly different requirements. |
|
Michał Kuna Member Joined in April 2015 Posts: 8 |
Posted 10 March 2019 - 11:38 CET |
|
Thnx Karol :)
So... skyshots is like a Russian Roulette :P |
Philippe Ardin  Member Joined in January 2017 Posts: 15 |
Posted 12 March 2019 - 09:18 CET |
|
There are more technical domains with clear rules where decisions are still... surprising...
Rejektor's decision : under exposed....
Attached photos:  |
|
Karol Trojanowski Senior admin Joined in June 2016 Posts: 82 |
Posted 12 March 2019 - 11:35 CET |
|
Philippe, I checked the photo from which you've presented the histogram. And my advice is not to fully rely on it, as when you look at that shot, it appears definitely too dark.
But main issue with that photo of yours was a terrifying amount of noise, which shouldn't occur with such ISO value as 200. |
Log in to post in the forum.